Children use ICT in their everyday lives at home and at
school. The internet is very popular
with all children and offers a wide range of opportunities for fun, learning
and development (Becta, 2007 and Byron, 2008).
However, with the advent of Web 2.0, web-based technologies that
emphasize collaboration and sharing among users, children are no longer passive
viewers online but active creators of digital content (Becta, 2007). By engaging at younger ages and being active
contributors; children are at risk of viewing unappropriated content or
becoming in contact with strangers that could lead the children outside the
safety net provided by teachers and parents from a young age. The new national curriculum (DfE, 2013) outlines
internet safety, or e-safety, as being able to use the technology safely and
respectfully while identifying what to do and where they can go for support
about content or contact they come across on the internet.
These risks have led to policies in schools that have a
zero tolerance stance for children accessing certain content online. These policies, similar to ones I have come
across on school experience, tend to block some websites that the policy makers
deem inappropriate. However, these
blocked websites do not reflect the reality of children’s everyday experiences of
using the internet for academic and social means (Beauchamp, 2012; Cranmer,
Selwyn and Potter, 2009). Websites I
have seen blocked, YouTube, Sparklebox and social websites, have been blocked
for different reasons. Although, these
measures at school reduce the risks for children at school, what good are those
measures when the children are at home and are free to access any content they
wish away from the classroom and its restrictions? This is why, as Beauchamp argues, that
e-safety should not be about restricting children but about educating them in
how to deal with these situations if they do arise when unsupervised
(Beauchamp, 2012). This view is echoed
by Ofsted (2010) who describe the best practices of e-safety as getting the
children to assess the risks of sites they use; this would then lead to the
children independently adopting safe practices when accessing the
internet. This means that the children
are monitoring their own online experience and know what to do when something
goes wrong.
The Byron Review (2007) identified ‘3 C’s of e-safety’ (Byron, 2007: 16) that schools can use to
educate children about the different risks associated with being online. These are content, contact and conduct. Content regards inappropriate material the
children may find online such as adverts, spam, personal information, and
misleading information. Contact relates
to the contact of someone online who may wish to abuse or bully the child. Conduct refers to the activities the child
may engage in that may place them in vulnerable situations. This could include the child being the
perpetrator of inappropriate activities including illegal downloading, hacking,
gambling, bullying or uploading inappropriate material. The grid in the Byron Review gives scope and
structure to the many and at times overlapping factors that can be deemed as
risks for children.
I have come across a collective consensus that children
cannot always be guarded and fully shield children from the risks associated
with the internet, we can however, educate them to become resilient. Therefore, the key message when educating
children about e-safety is that it is not about preventing children from having
fun or from them taking full advantage of the internet that is at their
fingertips; but to make sure they do it as safely as possible, giving peace of
mind to teachers and parents when children are exploring the internet
independently (Byron Review, 2007). If
teachers and parents are able to get this strong message across to children they
will be setting themselves up for a safe future whilst still being able to
enjoy the varied and rich content available on the internet.
Useful Sources
While researching for this blog I came across numerous
websites and articles that I felt were important for educating teachers and
parents about raising the awareness of e-safety to children; inside and outside
the classroom.
The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre
(CEOP) (online) Training and Knowledge Sharing [online] http://ceop.police.uk/Knowledge-Sharing/
Childnet. (online) Know
IT All Resources [online] http://www.childnet.com/resources/kia/
DfCSF. (2009) Cyberbullying: Supporting
School Staff [online] http://www.digizen.org/downloads/cyberbullying_teachers.pdf
Webwise. (online) Surfwise Educational Programme –
teachers handbook [online] http://moodle2-rsc.kent.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=275
References
Becta. (2007) Signposts
to safety: Teaching e-safety at Key Stages 1 and 2. London: Becta
Byron, T. (2008) Safer
Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review
The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre
(CEOP) (online) Training and Knowledge
Sharing [online] http://ceop.police.uk/Knowledge-Sharing/
(accessed 24/03/2014)
Childnet. (online) Know
IT All Resources [online] http://www.childnet.com/resources/kia/
(accessed 24/03/2014)
Cranmer, S., Selwyn, N. and Potter, J. (2009) ‘Exploring
primary pupils’ experiences and understandings of ‘e-safety’’, Education and Information Technologies,
Vol. 14, pp. 127-142
DfCSF. (2009) Cyberbullying:
Supporting School Staff [online] http://www.digizen.org/downloads/cyberbullying_teachers.pdf
(accessed 25/03/2014)
DfE. (2013) The
national curriculum in England: Key stages 1 and 2 framework document.
London: DfE
Ofsted. (2010) The
safe use of new technologies. Manchester: Ofsted
Webwise. (online) Surfwise Educational Programme –
teachers handbook [online] http://moodle2-rsc.kent.ac.uk/mod/resource/view.php?id=275
(accessed 26/03/2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment