The
World Wide Web is a completely different place as to when the National
Curriculum (1999) was published. As
McManus (2005) describes; Web 1.0 was predominantly read-only whilst Web 2.0 can
be categorised as ‘read-and-write’.
These ‘participatory’ and ‘collaborative’ (Lankshear and Knobel,
2011) technologies such as blogs, social networks, wikis and media sharing
platforms have become immensely popular in today’s culture. Greenhow, Robelia and Hughes (2009) see great
promise as well as challenges in these emergent technologies for transforming
education practice.
Our
practical session for this week focused on Web 2.0 technologies and new social digital
literacy practices. I particularly
enjoyed using ‘Jigzone’, ‘Tagxedo’ and ‘StoryBird’, as well as focusing on blogs in this module; I can see practical
uses for all of these in classroom.
However, becoming digitally literate is not just about exploring new emergent
technologies but with creating with them and understanding the creativity
opportunities that lie within them (FutureLab, 2010). These new technologies, such as blogging, are
indicative of real world participation.
In my research on Web 2.0 and social digital literacy I stumbled up an
interesting concept in the shape of Quad Blogging (Mitchell, 2010). The main concept of this idea is to get four
schools in partnership; while one school would be the focus and publish their
blog post, the other three schools leave comments and begin a collaborative discussion
between schools. Not only do the children
have real participants to interact with; it gives children a real purpose to
engage with this concept while still being in a safe and guarded environment;
where the teachers can act as moderators to monitor posts. This advantage of blogging can be harnessed
by teachers to take advantage of ‘Web 2.0
communicative opportunities’ (Crook, 2012: 77).
It has been observed that young people are readily engaged by
these technologies, it might be expected that Web 2.0 communication would be
eagerly adopted into educational practice.
However, Crook (2012) states that many teachers have been hesitant in
harnessing these new technologies to engage learners in the classroom. Merchant (2009) echoes these concerns as teachers
are used to the safe and methodical space for literacy teaching in classrooms where
they feel in control. Being away from
the comfy confines of their classroom in the big World Wide Web is an understandable
experience; however, if teachers can harness new technology and create a positive
environment for the children, like Quad Blogging, both teachers and children alike
can flourish in developing their digital literacy confidence.
References
Crook,
C. (2012) The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing
Web 2.0 practices into the school setting’. Oxford
Review of Education, Vol. 38 (1), pp.63-80
Greenhow,
Robelia and Hughes (2009) ‘Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We
Take Now?’. Educational Researcher
FutureLab.
(2010) Digital Literacy across the
Curriculum (online) http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/handbooks/digital_literacy.pdf (accessed
06/07/14)
Lankshear,
C & Knobel, M. (2011) New Literacies:
Everyday Practices and Social Learning 3rd edition. Open
University Press
McManus
(2005) ‘Web 2.0 is not about version numbers or betas’. Read/WriteWeb. (online) http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_20_is_not_a.php
(accessed 06/07/14)
Merchant,
G. (2009) ‘Literacy in virtual worlds’. Journal
of Research in Reading, Vol. 32 (1), pp.38-56
Mitchell,
D. (2010) Real Wider Audiences for Pupils.
(online) http://mrmitchell.heathfieldcps.net/2010/12/10/quad-blogging-an-idea-now-a-reality/
(accessed 06/07/14)
I also came across a classroom blog experience in my reading of Halsey (2007) where children upload podcasts. The reviewing, editing, refining and enhancing offers links with writing and I can fully understand how this would engage children. I believe this to be something to nurture in the classroom as an enhancement to traditional writing.
ReplyDelete